Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/21/1998

Bornemann v. Bornemann

Citations

  • 245 Conn. 508
  • 752 A.2d 978
  • 1998 Conn. LEXIS 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that trial court implicitly must have found that stock options were marital property when court distributed options between parties
  • collecting cases, including Frederick, and noting that the trend “has been to treat unvested stock options as property on the basis that the options create a contractual right in the employee who holds them that is a valuable form of intangible property”
  • collecting cases, including Frederick , and noting that the trend \has been to treat unvested stock options as property on the basis that the options create a contractual right in the employee who holds them that is a valuable form of intangible property\
  • “the date of dissolution is the appropriate date on which to value the parties’ assets”
  • trial court’s findings demonstrate proper interpretation of statute despite lack of express reference to statutory factors
  • stock options, like pension benefits, were marital property because they represented presently existing interest in that they created in holder enforceable contract right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz, McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Bornemann v. Bornemann

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.