Supreme Court of Connecticut· 12/20/2005
Williams v. Williams
Citations
- 886 A.2d 817
- 276 Conn. 491
- 2005 Conn. LEXIS 532
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing default presumption that alimony obligation terminates upon recipient’s remar- riage
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan, Borden, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Misthopoulos v. MisthopoulosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-13· cited 63×
- Blum v. BlumConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-07-22· cited 40×
- Doody v. DoodyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-02-13· cited 25×
- O'Brien v. O'BrienConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-10-16· cited 16×
- In Re Anthony E.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-07-11· cited 11×
- Nassra v. NassraConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-12-18· cited 10×
- Monette v. MonetteConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-06-26· cited 6×
- Reza v. LeyasiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-05-23· cited 1×
- State v. DanforthSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-02-10
- Nation-Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-04-21
- State v. VanDeusenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2015-11-03
- Fazio v. FazioConnecticut Appellate Court· 2016-01-05
- Dumbauld v. DumbauldConnecticut Appellate Court· 2016-03-08
- Dufresne v. DufresneConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-07-30
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-15· cited 184×
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-02· cited 139×
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-15· cited 94×
- Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-01-14· cited 32×
- Amodio v. AmodioConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-01-25· cited 32×
- Lawler v. LawlerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-07-11· cited 29×
- Vandal v. VandalConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-06-08· cited 29×
- Sheehan v. BalasicConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-08-19· cited 18×
- Sheehan v. BalasicSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-06-23· cited 13×
- Pulvermacher v. PulvermacherSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-05-21· cited 10×
- Rosato v. RosatoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-03-06· cited 9×
- Sullivan v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-10-30· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.