In the Interest of N.R.T., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, when Department satisfied section 161.004(a)’s requirements, under section 161.004(b), “trial court was free to consider evidence predating” prior order denying termination
• concluding that, when Department satisfied section 161.004(a)'s requirements, under section 161.004(b), \trial court was free to consider evidence predating\ prior order denying termination
• holding that termination of parental rights was in four-year-old child’s best interest in part because she had been in foster care since she was one year old
• considering that appellants had “no meaningful contact with their daughter” when evaluating evidence relevant to best interest determination
• considering that appellants had “no meaningful contact” with their child as evidence relevant to best interest determination
• considering that appellants had “no meaningful contact” with their child when evaluating evidence relevant to best-interest determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).