Court of Appeals of Utah· 6/21/1991
State v. Vigil
Citations
- 815 P.2d 1296
- 164 Utah Adv. Rep. 28
- 1991 Utah App. LEXIS 99
- 1991 WL 126094
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinction between findings of facts and conclusions of law based on substantive analysis notwithstanding label applied by trial court
- voluntariness of consent for search is mixed question of law and fact with predicate facts weighed against clearly erroneous standard and the resulting legal conclusions reviewed for correctness
- voluntariness of consent for search is mixed question of law and fact with predicate facts weighed against clearly erroneous standard and the resulting legal conclusions reviewed for correctness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bench, Greenwood, Orme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court· 1993-01-07· cited 251×
- State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court· 2002-12-20· cited 136×
- Woodward v. FazzioCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-12-09· cited 31×
- State v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-11-19· cited 23×
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-11-25· cited 22×
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-05-05· cited 20×
- State v. MunsenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-11-07· cited 19×
- State v. StricklingCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-12-03· cited 19×
- Olson v. Park-Craig-Olson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1991-08-14· cited 19×
- State v. ElderCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-08-07· cited 15×
- State v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1993-03-31· cited 14×
- State v. SykesCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-10-19· cited 12×
- State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-09-06· cited 11×
- State v. RibeCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-05-26· cited 2×
- State v. MogenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2002-07-11· cited 1×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 2,639×
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 2,420×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1944-06-12· cited 372×
- State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court· 1987-08-25· cited 237×
- State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 231×
- Acton v. DeliranUtah Supreme Court· 1987-05-22· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-11-20· cited 97×
- State v. ArroyoUtah Supreme Court· 1990-06-28· cited 95×
- United States v. Mark A. MaraghD.C. Circuit· 1990-01-09· cited 91×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-08-11· cited 87×
- Maragh v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-10-01· cited 81×
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 77×
- Dickey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 72×
- United States v. Harold Dean JonesSixth Circuit· 1981-02-12· cited 65×
- State v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-05-09· cited 63×
- Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-06-20· cited 62×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-07-18· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.