Rucker v. Dalton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is not an appellate court’s function to make findings of fact
• “findings should be sufficiently detailed and include enough subsidiary facts to disclose the steps by which the ultimate conclusion on each factual issue was reached”
• “[I]t is not the function of an appellate court to make findings of fact because it does not have the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses testify.”
• \[It is not the function of an appellate court to make findings of fact because it does not have the advantage of seeing or hearing the witnesses testify.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).