Seventh Circuit· 11/13/1997
Smith v. Severn
Citations
- 129 F.3d 419
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- underscoring that, to survive summary judgment, the non-moving party must set forth specific facts to establish a genuine triable issue
- noting that \the non-moving party's failure to contest the moving party's [facts]\ \[r]educ[es] the pool from which [reasonable] inferences may be made\ in the non-moving party's favor
- principal did not need to specifically tell student and his mother basis of suspension when it was apparent from the totality of the circumstances
- “A party ‘may not defeat a properly focused motion for summary judgment’ by relying on evidence that is ‘less than significantly probative.’” (citation omitted)
- “A party ‘may not defeat a properly focused motion for summary judgment’ by relying on evidence that is ‘less than significantly probative.’” (citation omitted)
- “The question of whether a public education is a fundamental right is not a novel one.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Heyne v. Metropolitan Nashville Public SchoolsSixth Circuit· 2011-08-26· cited 346×
- Montgomery v. American Airlines, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2010-11-19· cited 256×
- Sean Michael Flaim v. Medical College of OhioSixth Circuit· 2005-08-17· cited 133×
- John Burton v. Kohn Law Firm, S.C.Seventh Circuit· 2019-08-09· cited 80×
- Elizabeth Curran v. Ho Sung Kwon, Also Known as Alex Kwon, Revlon International Corporation, Jeremy Foster-FellSeventh Circuit· 1998-08-20· cited 75×
- United States v. Robert S. LuceSeventh Circuit· 2017-10-23· cited 54×
- Kirsch ex rel. Kirsch v. Brightstar Corp.N.D. Illinois· 2015-01-13· cited 51×
- Greisz v. Household Bank (Illinois)N.D. Illinois· 1998-08-06· cited 24×
- Haywood v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2001-11-01· cited 18×
- Turley v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2022-07-08· cited 15×
- Anderson v. Rizza Chevrolet, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1998-06-09· cited 12×
- Atcitty Ex Rel. Atcitty v. Board of Education of the San Juan County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1998-11-05· cited 8×
- Rodriguez v. Glock, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1998-12-08· cited 8×
- United States v. RaymondE.D. Wisconsin· 1999-07-27· cited 8×
- William Felkner v. Rhode Island CollegeSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2019-03-18· cited 8×
- Granowitz v. Redlands Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-01-14· cited 7×
- Reber v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceS.D. Indiana· 2000-03-29· cited 7×
- Borzych v. FrankW.D. Wisconsin· 2004-10-14· cited 7×
- Juniel v. Park Forest-Chicago Heights School District 163N.D. Illinois· 2001-12-18· cited 7×
- Wagner Ex Rel. Wagner-Garay v. Fort Wayne Community SchoolsN.D. Indiana· 2003-03-19· cited 6×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-05-14· cited 7,008×
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 5,431×
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-04-23· cited 3,699×
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 3,119×
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court· 1975-01-22· cited 3,014×
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 1,999×
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyFirst Circuit· 1991-12-16· cited 1,952×
- Maldonado-Denis v. Castillo-RodriguezFirst Circuit· 1994-05-06· cited 902×
- Smith v. SevernSeventh Circuit· 1997-11-13· cited 335×
- Rar, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation v. Turner Diesel, LimitedSeventh Circuit· 1997-03-03· cited 330×
- Kenneth SARSHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1993-10-18· cited 289×
- Brian Cornfield, a Minor, by His Mother and Next Friend, Janet Lewis v. Consolidated High School District No. 230, Richard Spencer, and James FryeSeventh Circuit· 1993-04-23· cited 286×
- Midwest Imports, Ltd. v. Les Coval and Joseph Pieciak & Co., P.C.Seventh Circuit· 1995-12-12· cited 213×
- Henry WOLF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUSS (AMERICA) INC., Defendant-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1996-04-17· cited 208×
- George Del Vecchio, Cross-Appellee v. Illinois Department of CorrectionsSeventh Circuit· 1994-07-19· cited 189×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.