Sean Michael Flaim v. Medical College of Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that due process was not violated when cross-examination would have been a fruitless exercise, so this language is dictum
• holding that school disciplinary boards are not bound by formal rules of evidence or rules of criminal procedure
• holding that due process was not violated when cross-examination would have been a fruitless exercise, so this language is dictum
• holding that student received adequate due process despite characterization of the dismissal as “disciplinary” and despite the failure to hold a formal hearing
• holding that student received adequate due process despite characterization of the dismissal as “disciplinary” and despite the failure to hold a formal hearing
• recognizing that “due process generally does not require an appeal from a school’s decision that was reached through constitutional procedures”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).