Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 5/20/1992

Smith v. Penrod Drilling Corp.

Citations

  • 960 F.2d 456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a contract for the supply and use of a vessel for drilling, completion, and workover services was maritime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Smith, Fitzwater

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Smith v. Penrod Drilling Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.