Skip to main content
· 7/26/1999

Hufnagel v. Omega Service Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 182 F.3d 340
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 17043
  • 1999 WL 543987

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the plaintiff’s action failed to meet either prong of the maritime tort test without reference to the plaintiff’s pending LHWCA claim
  • finding that plaintiff’s “employment furthered mineral production on the shelf’ because his “injuries occurred on a stationary [oil] drilling platform” located on the shelf
  • holding oil platform worker did not demonstrate substantial connection when he was injured aboard ship which he had been aboard for only seven days
  • holding maritime jurisdiction did not apply to accident that “occurred entirely on” fixed drilling platform that had “no function in navigation”
  • explaining that equipment attached to the platform instead of the vessel itself striking the petitioner does not satisfy the location test
  • applying Louisiana law to a negligence claim based on events that occurred on a platform off the Louisiana coast

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Barksdale, Benavides

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.