Southard v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing why a defendant could successfully assert qualified immunity, we noted that he “did not simply ignore the complaints .... Instead, [he] took some steps .... Even if those steps were ‘ineffectual,’ they do not demonstrate deliberate indifference.”
• stares, threats, and unreasonable work assignments not actionable
• undesirable work assignment not “employment action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).