Wright v. Combined Insurance Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the complete-preemption doctrine did not apply to HIPAA because the requisite congressional intent was lacking and because the relevant provisions related only “to its preemptive effect of state law, but not to the complete preemption factors”
• “If a defendant the notice of removal at any time thereafter, he may only do so to clarify the jurisdictional grounds for removal which were unartfully stated in the original notice.” (emphasis added)
• “If a defendant seeks to amend the notice of removal at any time thereafter, he may only do so to clarify the jurisdictional grounds for removal, which were unartfully stated in the original notice. He may not allege new jurisdictional grounds for removal.”
• finding no specific jurisdictional grant under HIPAA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).