Smith v. Hooligan's Pub & Oyster Bar, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence regarding bad acts was not relevant or essential to prove a material fact and served only to demonstrate bad character and propensity
• holding that cumulative evidence was nonetheless harmful
• requiring new trial where evidence of bar patron's bad acts improperly admitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).