Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 662 So. 2d 419
  • 1995 WL 653543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \[p]roper Williams rule evidence is that which possesses `obvious and telling similarities' to the crime charged.\
  • holding that similar crime evidence of a \smash-and-grab\ robbery would not be admissible in a \smash-and-grab\ robbery case because those types of robberies were not unusual
  • “Proper Williams rule evidence is that which possesses ‘obvious and telling similarities’ to the crime charged.”
  • “Improperly admitting Williams rule evidence is presumed harmful error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkdull, Nesbitt and Gersten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.