District of Columbia· 5/28/1996

Smith v. Dalton

Citations

927 F. Supp. 1
1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7264
1996 WL 294269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

remanding to the Board because Board did not have full opportunity to-eonsider the entire record
allowing suit against a 9 federal defendant under §1391(e)(1) where “he performs a significant amount of his official duties in this jurisdiction”
allowing suit against a federal defendant under § 1391(e)(1) when “he performs a significant amount of his official duties in this jurisdiction”
allowing suit against a federal defendant under § 1391(e)(1) where \he performs a significant amount of his official duties in this jurisdiction\
considering whether BCNR acted arbitrarily and capriciously by denying plaintiff’s application for correction of his service record without a hearing
finding remand appropriate in part because \it [wa]s not apparent to the court that the [agency] [ ] had a full opportunity to consider the [relevant] evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.