District of Columbia· 3/24/2011
Rudo v. Geren
Citations
- 818 F. Supp. 2d 17
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30487
- 2011 WL 1087291
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the plaintiff's due process claim was not frivolous and the ABCMR board was required to address it”
- the Board must respond in some way to a plaintiffs non-frivolous arguments; it may not simply identify them without further comment
- on a factual attack, a court may not “resolve genuinely 18 disputed facts where the question of jurisdiction is dependent on the resolution of factual 19 issues going to the merits.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Ricardo M. Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fulbright v. McHughDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-09· cited 44×
- Albino v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2015-01-15· cited 15×
- Saint-Fleur v. McHughDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-17· cited 12×
- McDonough v. MabusDistrict of Columbia· 2012-11-29· cited 8×
- Bennett v. MurphyD. Massachusetts· 2016-02-26· cited 5×
- Reeder v. JamesDistrict of Columbia· 2015-08-14· cited 4×
- Huffman v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-08· cited 4×
- Manning v. FanningDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-29· cited 1×
- Tennekoon v. FanningDistrict of Columbia· 2016-01-15
- Pedden v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2019-11-13
- Lakner v. EsperDistrict of Columbia· 2021-03-25
- Mazarji v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2023-02-24
- Blanco v. WormuthDistrict of Columbia· 2023-10-16
- Byrd v. Department of DefenseDistrict of Columbia· 2024-09-03
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 8,453×
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 7,564×
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court· 1977-02-23· cited 3,951×
- Dennis A. Dickson v. Secretary of DefenseD.C. Circuit· 1995-10-31· cited 267×
- Tourus Records, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2001-08-17· cited 263×
- Michael K. Frizelle v. Rodney E. Slater, Secretary of TransportationD.C. Circuit· 1997-04-25· cited 195×
- Cone, George E. v. Caldera, LouisD.C. Circuit· 2000-09-12· cited 135×
- MD Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 1998-01-16· cited 109×
- Leonard P. Matlovich v. Secretary of the Air Force and Colonel Alton J. ThogersenD.C. Circuit· 1978-12-06· cited 82×
- De Cicco v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1982-03-24· cited 56×
- Calloway v. BrownleeDistrict of Columbia· 2005-03-30· cited 54×
- Puerto Rico Higher Education Assistance Corporation v. Richard W. Riley, Secretary of the Department of EducationD.C. Circuit· 1993-12-10· cited 50×
- Finn v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1971-01-26· cited 43×
- Musengo, James v. Caldera, LouisD.C. Circuit· 2002-04-16· cited 40×
- Smith v. DaltonDistrict of Columbia· 1996-05-28· cited 40×
- Casey v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1985-05-13· cited 35×
- Roberts v. HarveyDistrict of Columbia· 2006-08-03· cited 31×
- Menkes v. Department of Homeland SecurityD.C. Circuit· 2007-05-15· cited 25×
- F.D.R. Fox v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1996-05-21· cited 20×
- Mudd v. CalderaDistrict of Columbia· 1998-10-29· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.