Washington Supreme Court· 11/2/1995
Smith v. Continental Cas. Co.
Citations
- 904 P.2d 749
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing Court of Appeals’ finding of ambiguity in insurance policy based on “an apparent typographical error,” and emphasizing that it “does not necessarily follow” that the existence of such an error renders a policy ambiguous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Findlay v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1996-06-06· cited 86×
- Findlay v. United Pacific Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1996-06-06· cited 80×
- Dioxin/Organochlorine Ctr. v. POLLUTION CONTROLWashington Supreme Court· 1997-03-06· cited 79×
- Center v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court· 1997-03-06· cited 75×
- Ross v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-17· cited 41×
- Ross v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1997-07-17· cited 39×
- Capelouto v. Valley Forge InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-11-01· cited 38×
- Capelouto v. Valley Forge Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-12-07· cited 29×
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. English Cove Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-04-26· cited 24×
- New Hampshire Indem. Co., Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2003-03-13· cited 21×
- New Hampshire Indemnity Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2003-03-13· cited 19×
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. English Cove Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-06-08· cited 12×
- Shannon Kries et vir v. WA-SPOK Primary Care, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-09-10· cited 12×
- Kaplan v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-01-10· cited 10×
- Mendota Insurance Co. v. Ware Ex Rel. WareMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-05-24· cited 9×
- Shields v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-07-16· cited 6×
- Western National Assurance Co. v. Shelcon Construction Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-05-05· cited 6×
- Bushnell v. Medico InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-02-07· cited 5×
- Bushnell v. MEDICO INS. CO.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-02-07· cited 3×
- Parker v. United Services Automobile AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-09-20· cited 3×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court· 1988-08-18· cited 169×
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1986-10-09· cited 161×
- Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court· 1993-07-15· cited 159×
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court· 1982-04-08· cited 158×
- Farmers Insurance v. MillerWashington Supreme Court· 1976-04-29· cited 110×
- American Star Insurance v. GriceWashington Supreme Court· 1993-07-29· cited 107×
- Finney v. Farmers Insurance Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court· 1979-10-11· cited 91×
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1994-05-19· cited 88×
- American Star Insurance v. GriceWashington Supreme Court· 1994-01-20· cited 49×
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. JeromeWashington Supreme Court· 1993-08-26· cited 39×
- Motorists Mut. Ins. v. BittlerCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court· 1968-02-20· cited 36×
- Smith v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 27×
- Grange Insurance v. Great American InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1978-02-23· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.