Skip to main content
· 5/24/2011

Mendota Insurance Co. v. Ware Ex Rel. Ware

Citations

  • 348 S.W.3d 68
  • 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 706
  • 2011 WL 1988420

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the insured is entitled to a pro-coverage interpretation if the terms are susceptible of two possible interpretations and there is room for construction
  • stating that, the \insured is entitled to a pro-coverage interpretation of an insurance policy if the terms are susceptible of two possible interpretations and there is room for construction\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Witt, Welsh, Ahuja

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.