Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEM

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] denial of coverage based on a reasonable interpretation of the policy is not bad faith,” even if incorrect
• explaining' that if insurance contract language is clear and unambiguous, the court “may not modify the contract or create ambiguity where none exists”
• “An endorsement attached to a policy * * * must be read with the policy * * *.”
• “two occurrences where driver struck two cars, but gained control between first and second impact”
• an endorsement forms part of the 13 policy “even if the result is a new and different contract”
• “As endorsements are later in time, they generally control over inconsistent terms or conditions in a policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).