· 4/29/1976
Farmers Insurance v. Miller
Citations
- 549 P.2d 9
- 87 Wash. 2d 70
- 1976 Wash. LEXIS 633
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- automobile which could be driven after installing battery and doing other inexpensive repairs was an automobile within the meaning of the policy
- OMV exclusion does not violate public policy, because “statute does not mandate any particular scope for the definition of who is an insured in a particular automobile insurance policy”
- “[T]he court cannot … create a contract for the parties which they did not make themselves, 4 nor can the court impose obligations which never before existed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brachtenbach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.