Skip to main content
· 4/29/1976

Farmers Insurance v. Miller

Citations

  • 549 P.2d 9
  • 87 Wash. 2d 70
  • 1976 Wash. LEXIS 633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • automobile which could be driven after installing battery and doing other inexpensive repairs was an automobile within the meaning of the policy
  • OMV exclusion does not violate public policy, because “statute does not mandate any particular scope for the definition of who is an insured in a particular automobile insurance policy”
  • “[T]he court cannot … create a contract for the parties which they did not make themselves, 4 nor can the court impose obligations which never before existed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brachtenbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.