Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/19/2005
Smith v. Arnold
Citations
- 127 Wash. App. 98
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no excusable neglect when neither the defendant’s nor the insurer’s failure to appear was the result of excusable neglect
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brintnall, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Morin v. BurrisWashington Supreme Court· 2007-06-28· cited 121×
- Gutz v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-09· cited 27×
- In re the Welfare of S.I.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-11-18· cited 22×
- Servatron, Inc. v. Intelligent Wireless Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-03-24· cited 22×
- Beers v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-03-13· cited 12×
- Doty-Fielding v. Town of South PrairieCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-03-12· cited 11×
- Meade v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-04-30· cited 10×
- Matia Investment Fund, Inc. v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-09-13· cited 5×
- Matia Inv. Fund, Inc. v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-09-13· cited 1×
- Charity Meade v. David A. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-04-30
- Terry And Celeste Vanderstoep v. Gary And Kathleen GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-09-19
- Doty-Fielding v. Town of South PrairieCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-03-18
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court· 1992-04-16· cited 1,592×
- Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized TechnologyNinth Circuit· 1988-02-24· cited 443×
- H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeD.C. Circuit· 1970-09-18· cited 351×
- Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR.Washington Supreme Court· 2001-08-23· cited 143×
- Nguyen v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court· 2001-08-23· cited 137×
- Davis v. Microsoft Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2003-06-05· cited 120×
- Zuelzke Tool & Engineering Co., Inc. v. Anderson Die Castings, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1991-02-22· cited 66×
- Laura Wilson v. Moore and Associates, Inc., Dba Uni-Check, Fdba Telecheck Hawaii, a Hawaii CorporationNinth Circuit· 1977-12-23· cited 62×
- Tiffin v. HendricksWashington Supreme Court· 1954-06-10· cited 55×
- Showalter v. OatsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-10-26· cited 54×
- Dlouhy v. DlouhyWashington Supreme Court· 1960-03-10· cited 53×
- Showalter v. Wild OatsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-30· cited 47×
- In re the Estate of StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-01-08· cited 44×
- Gage v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-08-07· cited 43×
- Harris v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court· 2004-10-14· cited 42×
- Rafael Muniz, Jr. v. Edgardo R. VidalFirst Circuit· 1984-08-02· cited 36×
- Prest v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-08-25· cited 34×
- In Re Estate of StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-04-09· cited 33×
- James Turner and Linda Chase v. Julio C. SalvatierraFifth Circuit· 1978-09-18· cited 29×
- Bradbury v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1979-01-05· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.