Ninth Circuit· 2/24/1988
Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized Technology
Citations
- 840 F.2d 685
- 10 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 802
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2191
- 1988 WL 12961
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that default cannot be entered if the defendant has filed a response indicating 22 its intent to defend the action
- stating that only “substantial compliance with Rule 4” will provide personal jurisdiction over the defendant
- stating that only “substantial compliance with Rule 4” will provide personal jurisdiction over the defendant
- stating that service of process is not limited solely 23 to officially designated officers, managing agents, or agents designated to receive process
- noting that the company was small, making the role of a receptionist “commensurately large in the structure of the company,” particularly where she was the only employee in the office when the process server arrived
- discussing requirements for perfecting service against a corporation under Fed. R. Crv. P. 4(d)(3)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sneed, Pregerson, Kozinski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Signed Personal Check No. 730 of MesleNinth Circuit· 2010-08-04· cited 361×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RossNinth Circuit· 2007-10-15· cited 247×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Internet Solutions for Business Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-11· cited 178×
- Prewitt Enterprises, Inc. v. Organization of Petroleum Exporting CountriesEleventh Circuit· 2003-12-18· cited 169×
- Karen L. Edwards v. Occidental Chemical CorporationNinth Circuit· 1990-01-09· cited 107×
- Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-02-26· cited 87×
- Hall v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court· 2010-08-26· cited 81×
- United States v. Angela AguilarNinth Circuit· 2015-04-10· cited 78×
- Clifton Whidbee v. Pierce CountyNinth Circuit· 2017-05-26· cited 68×
- Harold E. Straub v. A P Green, Inc., and Atlas Turner, Inc., a Foreign CorporationNinth Circuit· 1994-10-17· cited 55×
- North Central Illinois Laborers' District Council v. S.J. Groves & Sons Company, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1988-05-19· cited 54×
- Burleson v. LathemMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-11-15· cited 50×
- Arbogast Family Trust v. River Crossings, LLCUtah Supreme Court· 2010-05-14· cited 49×
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 1998-06-01· cited 36×
- Cales v. WillsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2002-07-11· cited 33×
- Johnson v. RaoMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-03-22· cited 33×
- R. Griggs Group Ltd. v. Filanto SpaD. Nevada· 1996-02-05· cited 30×
- Franchise Holding II, LLC v. Huntington Restaurants Group, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2004-07-20· cited 30×
- DFSB Kollective Co. v. BourneN.D. California· 2012-09-13· cited 28×
- In Re ButtsE.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-09-18· cited 23×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeD.C. Circuit· 1970-09-18· cited 351×
- Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes and Charles PayneNinth Circuit· 1986-09-05· cited 308×
- Eduard Falk and Lettye M. Falk v. Sun Cha AllenNinth Circuit· 1984-08-02· cited 301×
- Jackson v. HayakawaNinth Circuit· 1982-08-03· cited 266×
- Jose Luis Pena v. Seguros La Comercial, S.A.Ninth Circuit· 1985-09-04· cited 265×
- United Food Workers Union, Locals 197, 373, 428, 588, 775, 839, 870, 1119, 1179 & 1532 v. Alpha Beta Co.Ninth Circuit· 1984-07-10· cited 185×
- Meadows v. Dominican RepublicNinth Circuit· 1987-05-14· cited 183×
- Popovich v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-12-07· cited 148×
- Leon Schwab v. Bullock's Inc., a CorporationNinth Circuit· 1975-01-06· cited 89×
- Top Form Mills, Inc. v. Sociedad Nationale Industria Applicazioni ViscosaS.D. New York· 1977-03-16· cited 66×
- Laura Wilson v. Moore and Associates, Inc., Dba Uni-Check, Fdba Telecheck Hawaii, a Hawaii CorporationNinth Circuit· 1977-12-23· cited 62×
- Union Asbestos & Rubber Company, by Change of Name Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products CompanySeventh Circuit· 1964-03-04· cited 47×
- Nichols v. Surgitool, Inc.W.D. New York· 1976-08-30· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.