· 9/18/1970
H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder Loepfe
Citations
- 432 F.2d 689
- 139 U.S. App. D.C. 256
- 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 538
- 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7289
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that default judgment is appropriate when “the adversary process has been halted because of an essentially unresponsive party”
- holding that default judgment is appropriate when “the adversary process has been halted because of an essentially unresponsive party”
- holding that default judgment is appropriate when “the adversary process has been halted because of an essentially unresponsive party”
- holding that default judgment is appropriate when “the adversary process has been halted because of an essentially unresponsive party”
- holding that default judgment is appropriate when “the adversary process has been halted because of an essentially unresponsive party”
- holding that default judgment is appropriate when “the adversary process has been halted because of an essentially unresponsive party”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bazelon, Megowan, Robinson, Chambers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.