Skip to main content

Smallwood v. State

Citations

  • 935 S.W.2d 530
  • 326 Ark. 813
  • 1996 Ark. LEXIS 661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the denial of a motion seeking a particular sentence was sufficient preservation of an issue for appeal
  • holding that the denial of a motion seeking a particular sentence was sufficient preservation of an issue for appeal
  • holding that the issue was not preserved because the defense counsel waited until after the witness had answered the question once and the State had asked the question a second time before objecting
  • holding that the issue was not preserved because the defense counsel waited until after the witness had answered the question once and the State had asked the question a second time before objecting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roaf, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.