Skip to main content

Urquhart v. State

Citations

  • 621 S.W.2d 218
  • 273 Ark. 486
  • 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring defendant to remove shirt in front of jury, revealing scar, in order to verify witness’s description was not prejudicial
  • defendant in rape case not prejudiced by being required to reveal his scar to jury where, in opening statement, his counsel told jury that consent, not identification, would be the issue at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hickman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.