Skip to main content

Vaughn v. State

Citations

  • 338 Ark. 220
  • 992 S.W.2d 785

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that where defendant filed a pretrial motion to suppress that was not ruled upon, defendant was required to renew objection and obtain ruling when that evidence was introduced at trial to preserve issue for appeal
  • refusing to apply Wicks in the case of alleged improper cross- examination and closing argument comments about the defense attorney’s integrity
  • refusing to apply third Wicks exception in the case of alleged improper cross-examination
  • refusing to apply third Wicks exception in the case of allegedly improper cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Dub

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.