Skip to main content

Hale v. State

Citations

  • 31 S.W.3d 850
  • 343 Ark. 62
  • 2000 Ark. LEXIS 583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to adopt the Jackson test and preserving the traditional test under Arkansas law which requires “substantial” evidence to support a jury verdict in a criminal case
  • declining to adopt Jackson’s “rational trier of fact” test as the appropriate standard of review when there is a challenge to. the sufficiency of the evidence
  • declining to adopt Jackson and continuing to following its traditional requirement under state law that there be \substantial evidence\ to support a criminal conviction
  • declaring an argument abandoned on appeal when appellant mentioned it in the points on appeal but made no argument regarding it
  • declining to adopt Jackson and continuing to [J-88-2017] - 32 following its traditional requirement under state law that there be “substantial evidence” to support a criminal conviction
  • declaring an argument abandoned 6 briefs on appeal—he sought discovery to determine if a fair cross section challenge was required. Jenner requested the following items in discovery: (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.