Skurtu v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging the Ninth Circuit‟s conclusion that §1252(b)(9) “by [its] plain language, appl[ies] to only those claims seeking judicial review of orders of removal,” but concluding that the Skurtu petitioner was, in fact, “seek[ing] review of the IJ‟s removal order”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).