Pupi White v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pendency of motion to reopen or reconsider an order of deportation does not render the order nonfinal for jurisdictional purposes
• noting that a nonfinal removal order “would be a nullity and there would be nothing to execute”
• noting that a nonfinal removal order “would be a nullity and there would be nothing to execute”
• holding generic computer components like “interface,” 7 “network,” and “database” do not satisfy the inventive concept requirement
• holding generic computer components like “interface,” 7 “network,” and “database” do not satisfy the inventive concept requirement
• “[P]etitioner does not have an automatic right to be 7 present at a hearing in which he is collaterally attacking his criminal conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).