Mohammed Shawkat Haider v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America, 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding court of appeals was sole means for judicial review of petitioner’s habeas petition because it did “nothing more than attack the IJ’s removal order”
• holding service by mail comported with due process in immigration removal proceedings where the plaintiff has a duty to update mailing address
• stating that \the [notice to appear] and the [notice of hearing] ... combined to provide [ ] requisite notice\ but it was the \[notice to appear] [that] initiated removal proceedings ....\ (emphasis added)
• stating that \the [Notice to Appear] and the [Notice of Hearing] ... combined to provide [ ] requisite notice\ but it was the \[Notice to Appear] [that] initiated removal proceedings ...\ (emphasis added)
• \[J]urisdiction vests with the Immigration Court when the INS files a charging document with the Court.\
• “The INA simply requires that an alien be provided written notice of his hearing; it does not require that the NTA . . . satisfy all of § 1229(a)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).