Skip to main content

Bell v. State

Citations

  • 845 So. 2d 856
  • 2002 WL 732341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Evidence which would support a conviction of a charged offense would necessarily support a conviction for a lesser included offense.”
  • Rule 32 petitioner's claim, that one of the prior convictions used to enhance his sentence was a misdemeanor conviction, was a jurisdictional issue challenging the legality of the sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.