Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 5/25/2000

Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 213 F.3d 1050
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 5495
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4098
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11620
  • 2000 WL 675138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Unless the [Board] acted arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary to law, we should not disturb [its] ruling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ferguson, Pregerson, Wardlaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

202 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

40 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.