Laoura Ivanovna TEDEEVA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that BIA’s interpretation of “not practicable” is “sensible construction of the statute, especially in light of other provisions of the [A]ct which indicate a legislative scheme that allows the INS efficiently to pursue hearings in absentia”
• concluding in person notice of deportation hearings is not required under the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).