Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he transitional rules also preclude direct judicial review of the BIA’s determinations of the threshold eligibility requirements of ‘extreme hardship’ . . .”
• holding that the transitional rules preclude direct judicial review of the BIA’s discretionary determination of “extreme hardship” in suspension of deportation cases
• holding that the transitional rules preclude judicial review of the BIA’s determination of extreme hardship
• holding that the ultimate decision whether to grant suspension of deportation, the precursor to cancellation of removal, is discretionary, and therefore unreviewable under transitional rules limiting judicial review of “discretionary decisions”
• noting Congress's intent to vest the Board of Immigration Appeals with final appellate jurisdiction in most deportation proceedings
• reviewing the Board's decision that applicants had failed to satisfy the extreme hardship test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).