Javier Maravilla Maravilla Claudia Lopez Sanchez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner “need not show that [he] would win or lose on any claims.”
• remanding for reconsideration because the BIA’s decision was “[s]o far afield of the proper two-pronged analysis ... that it [wa]s unclear whether it actually treated petitioners’ motion as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”
• requiring the BIA to “indicate with specificity that it heard and considered petitioner’s claims”
• remanding for reconsideration because the BIA’s decision was “[s]o far afield of the proper two-pronged analysis . . . that it [wa]s unclear whether it actu- ally treated petitioners’ motion as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”
• “This court has held that the BIA must ‘indicate with specificity that it heard and considered petitioner’s claims.’ ”
• on a motion to reopen, the BIA should not “directly adjudge[] . . . whether petitioners would win or lose their claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).