District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 6/8/1978
Sinclair v. United States
Citations
- 388 A.2d 1201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that separate conviction for kidnapping will not lie if kidnapping is coextensive with and incidental to other crime of conviction
- issued the same day as Robinson, and rejecting “unduly expansive” reading that contemplated “short and momentary removals”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris, MacK, Reilly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nelson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-12-30· cited 98×
- Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-22· cited 80×
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-06-02· cited 44×
- Boyd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-02-15· cited 42×
- Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-07-21· cited 29×
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-12-18· cited 28×
- Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-04-03· cited 21×
- Smothers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-06-15· cited 18×
- West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-11-13· cited 18×
- Hagins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-03-31· cited 16×
- ANTHONY RICHARDSON and JAMES WALKER v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-06-11· cited 15×
- Beck v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-05-23· cited 14×
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-08-18· cited 12×
- Vines v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-05-19· cited 8×
- Morgan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-05-22· cited 6×
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-10-02· cited 6×
- In re D.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-02-18· cited 5×
- In Re DwDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-02-18
- Cardozo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-07-29
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 1,226×
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-10-02· cited 510×
- People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1958-05-27· cited 311×
- People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-12-18· cited 252×
- People v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals· 1965-02-04· cited 219×
- People v. MutchCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-03-24· cited 182×
- People v. LombardiNew York Court of Appeals· 1967-07-07· cited 146×
- People v. TimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-03-24· cited 83×
- Deane Hill Country Club, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-06-01· cited 80×
- People v. FlorioNew York Court of Appeals· 1950-05-25· cited 77×
- United States v. Edward Baker, Ralph Masciola and Dominick DinorscioSecond Circuit· 1970-03-09· cited 73×
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-06-02· cited 44×
- United States v. Tyrone Rogers Young, United States of America v. Wayne HudsonFourth Circuit· 1975-03-17· cited 40×
- United States v. Lawrence B. Wolford, United States of America v. Thomas FlurryD.C. Circuit· 1971-03-25· cited 39×
- United States v. Glenn Walter Alexander DelamotteSecond Circuit· 1971-02-22· cited 37×
- Rice v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-06-24· cited 29×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-11-22· cited 27×
- Arrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-01-13· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.