Hagins v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an argument that the jury should have been instructed that it could not convict Hagins of kidnapping “if the alleged ‘confinement’ . . . was factually incidental to” the charged rape
• rejecting argument that defendant charged with rape could not be convicted of kidnapping if the alleged “confinement” was incidental to the sexual assaults, because “‘non-coextensive’ (or ‘non-incidental’) confinement” is not a statutory element of the crime of kidnapping

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).