Skip to main content
· 3/9/1970

United States v. Edward Baker, Ralph Masciola and Dominick Dinorscio

Citations

  • 419 F.2d 83

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “for ransom or reward or otherwise” element contained in 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a) is satisfied where the defendant’s “ultimate purpose sought to be furthered by [the] kidnap[p]ing is theft”
  • no double-jeopardy violation when “the only prejudice [defendant] suffered is psychological; his hopes were first raised, then quickly lowered”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumbard, Waterman, Kaufman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.