Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 11/22/1974
Moore v. State
Citations
- 329 A.2d 48
- 23 Md. App. 540
- 1974 Md. App. LEXIS 310
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in affirming kidnapping conviction in conjunction with rape court expressly rejected New York rule
- “ ‘The true test of merger under the modern doctrine is whether one crime necessarily involves the other, viz., when the facts necessary to prove the lesser offense are essential ingredients in establishing the greater offense, the lesser offense is merged into the greater offense.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Gilbert and Davidson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RichSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-05-13· cited 105×
- Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-02-13· cited 92×
- People v. HendersonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1991-05-06· cited 72×
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-11-28· cited 63×
- State v. StoufferCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-09· cited 45×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-07· cited 43×
- Isaacs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-06-07· cited 33×
- Sinclair v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-06-08· cited 25×
- State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-04-07· cited 25×
- Jackson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-03-28· cited 21×
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-03· cited 15×
- Stancil v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-09· cited 14×
- Grimes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-01-11· cited 13×
- Omans v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-11-19· cited 13×
- Jones-Harris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-03-13· cited 12×
- Pinkett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-02· cited 12×
- Preyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-04-17· cited 10×
- Kackley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-06-07· cited 10×
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-10· cited 7×
- McGrier v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-06· cited 7×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-05· cited 1,768×
- Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1952-06-09· cited 304×
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
- People v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals· 1965-02-04· cited 219×
- Johnson v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1908-07-02· cited 215×
- People v. LombardiNew York Court of Appeals· 1967-07-07· cited 146×
- JOHNSON, ETC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-05-05· cited 99×
- Folk v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-03-31· cited 73×
- Abrams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1967-03-09· cited 71×
- People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-04-15· cited 69×
- State v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-06-26· cited 63×
- State v. AyersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-04-08· cited 38×
- State v. McCoyOregon Supreme Court· 1968-02-21· cited 35×
- Brocker Manufacturing & Supply Co. v. MashburnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-03-19· cited 33×
- Rice v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-06-24· cited 29×
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-07-23· cited 29×
- Crenshaw v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-11-12· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.