Skip to main content

Sims v. State

Citations

  • 753 So. 2d 66
  • 2000 WL 137087

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that rule 3.852\is a discovery rule for public records production ancillary to proceedings pursuant to rules 3.850 and 3.851\
  • explaining that rule 3.852 “is a discovery rule for public records production ancillary to proceedings pursuant to rules 3.850 and 3.851”
  • explaining that rule 3.852(h)(3) is “not intended to be a procedure authorizing a fishing expedition for records unrelated to a colorable claim for postconviction relief”
  • reviewing order denying public records under rule 3.852 on plenary appeal where capital defendant’s warrant had been signed and successive postconviction motion was still pending
  • “The use [in rule 3.852(h)(3)] of the past tense and such words and phrases as ‘requested,’ ‘previously,’ ‘received,’ ‘produced,’ ‘previous request,’ and ‘produced previously’ are not happenstance.”
  • “This rule is.a discovery rule for .public records production ancillary to proceedings pursuant to rules 3.850 and 3.851.” (quoting Amends. to Fla. R. of Crim. Pro., 754 So.2d 640, 643 (Fla. 1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.