Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 922 So. 2d 1024
  • 2006 WL 357869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \the trial court was laden with the responsibility to determine whether a proper basis existed to return property\ upon the filing of defendant's facially sufficient motion for return of seized property (citations omitted)
  • holding that \the trial court was laden with the responsibility to determine whether a proper basis existed to return property\ upon the filing of defendant's facially sufficient motion for return of seized property (citations omitted)
  • explaining that it is “well-settled that representations by an attorney for one of the parties regarding the facts . . . [do] not constitute evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.