Segars-Andrews v. Judicial Merit Selection Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that constitutional provisions will not be construed to impose limitations beyond their clear meaning
• approving legislative membership on Judicial Merit Selection Commission as incidental to the constitutionally mandated legislative function of electing judges
• \It is the duty of this Court to interpret and declare the meaning of the constitution.\
• \It is the duty of this Court to interpret and declare the meaning of the constitution.\
• resolving purely legal questions regarding the Judicial Merit Selection Commission
• resolving purely legal questions regarding the Judicial Merit Selection Commission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).