Simmons v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 630 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) does not apply to habitual offender statute
• finding that testimony concerning the victim’s out-of-court statement about his confidence in his ability to identify his assailant was not a statement of identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ibar v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-03-09· cited 77×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-28· cited 23×
• Robbinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-16· cited 22×
• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-03· cited 2×
• MARLON A. ELLISON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-29· cited 1×
• Morant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-09· cited 1×
• McFadden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-25

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Goodwin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-12-16· cited 292×
• Eutsey v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-04-24· cited 180×
• State v. Rucker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-02-04· cited 116×
• Wright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-09· cited 34×
• Stanford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-23· cited 19×
• Malone v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-20· cited 1×