Skip to main content

Wright v. State

Citations

  • 780 So. 2d 216
  • 2001 WL 108899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that nothing in Apprendi overrules the Florida Supreme Court's holding in Eutsey v. State, 383 So.2d 219 (Fla.1980
  • holding that the findings required under the habitual offender statute fall with Apprendi's \recidivism\ exception
  • rejecting argument that jury findings — as to existence of prior convictions for qualifying offenses committed within five years that were not vacated or pardoned — are necessary for habitual offender treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pleus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.