Sherry v. Sherry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution requires that the federal law be given effect over the state law” in that context
• adopting with approval California courts’ reasoning “based in part on United States Supreme Court cases holding that the Social Security Act, by means of a tax, creates a public benefit that can be reduced or altered, but it does not create either contract 15 or property rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reed v. Reed
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2009-03-20· cited 95×
• Olson v. Olson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 73×
• Kirk v. Kirk
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1990-07-05· cited 29×
• Beesley v. Beesley
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1988-06-10· cited 23×
• Wood v. Wood
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1993-06-25· cited 21×
• Bell v. Bell
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1992-07-01· cited 15×
• Simmons v. Simmons
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-04-10· cited 12×
• Bayer v. Bayer
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-09-14· cited 10×
• United States v. Ellen Swenson
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-08-19· cited 8×
• Lang v. Lang
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-12-02· cited 6×
• Neibaur v. Neibaur
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2005-12-02· cited 4×
• Bowlden v. Bowlden
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1989-10-03· cited 4×
• Hunt v. Hunt
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-10-16· cited 3×
• Farnsworth v. Farnsworth
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2024-10-23

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Flemming v. Nestor
  Supreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 1,508×
• McCarty v. McCarty
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 1,052×
• United States v. Yazell
  Supreme Court· 1966-01-18· cited 427×
• Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-05-21· cited 132×
• Rasmussen v. Martin
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1983-02-22· cited 95×
• Simplot v. Simplot
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1974-06-13· cited 68×
• Suter v. Suter
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1976-02-26· cited 63×
• Shill v. Shill
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1979-09-11· cited 51×
• Donndelinger v. Donndelinger
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1984-10-29· cited 38×
• Martsch v. Martsch
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-04-16· cited 32×
• In Re Marriage of Hillerman
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-08-19· cited 30×
• Duke v. Duke
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1980-07-30· cited 22×
• In Re Marriage of Nizenkoff
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-12-21· cited 22×
• In Re Marriage of Cohen
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-05-16· cited 22×
• Fahrenwald v. LaBonte
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-10-28· cited 13×