Skip to main content
· 8/16/2007

Siesta Sol, LLC v. Brooks Pharmacy, Inc.

Citations

  • 617 F. Supp. 2d 38
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60285
  • 2007 WL 2377044

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to satisfy the Statute of Frauds, a writing must be \signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought\
  • “the Statute of Frauds was inapplicable because the defendant’s obligation was fundamentally not for the purchase of goods but for payment for [the plaintiffs] services”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William E. Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.