Sibley v. Sprint Nextel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a request to seal and noting that “to parties do not demonstrate that redaction would be insufficient to protect any information which is legitimately confidential personal information”
• “While determining damages will require individual calculations, this does not preclude a finding of commonality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Sibley v. Sprint Nextel Corp.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Sibley v. Sprint Nextel Corp.
  D. Kansas· 2016-07-29· cited 3×
• Sibley v. Sprint Nextel Corp.
  D. Kansas· 2014-04-14· cited 2×