Fujitsu Ltd. v. Belkin International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a motion to dismiss is “not the proper 5 time to initiate claim construction,” in part because it “would be starting the process of evaluating 6 the merits” of the case
• “Claim construction and infringement analysis should not be resolved on a 2 motion to dismiss.”
• “service generally will be quashed and the action preserved in those situations in which there is a reasonable prospect that the plaintiff ultimately will be able to serve the defendant properly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).