Shochat v. Weisz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Not having demonstrated any possible prejudice, the plaintiff’s motion for leave to increase the amount alleged in the ad damnum clause is granted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re AnnTaylor Stores Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 1992-07-27· cited 32×
• International Paving Systems, Inc. v. Van-Tulco, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1994-10-11· cited 27×
• Cuccolo v. Lipsky, Goodkin & Co.
  S.D. New York· 1993-07-13· cited 14×
• Ahmed v. Trupin
  S.D. New York· 1993-01-05· cited 9×
• Violette v. Armonk Associates, L.P.
  S.D. New York· 1994-04-22· cited 4×

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Conley v. Gibson
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
• Foman v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
• Scheuer v. Rhodes
  Supreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
• Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder
  Supreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
• Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores
  Supreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,261×
• Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,218×
• Reves v. Ernst & Young
  Supreme Court· 1990-04-16· cited 433×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Defendants
  Second Circuit· 1981-06-22· cited 432×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,922 James Bloor v. Carro, Spanbock, Londin, Rodman & Fass
  Second Circuit· 1985-01-21· cited 289×
• Richardson Greenshields Securities, Inc. v. Mui-Hin Lau, Ho Sih Fong, Kau-Ying Lau, Ying Lup Lau, and Wai Yau Chi
  Second Circuit· 1987-07-30· cited 242×
• Luce v. Edelstein
  Second Circuit· 1986-09-26· cited 234×
• Cosmas v. Hassett
  Second Circuit· 1989-09-12· cited 233×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,060 the Connecticut National Bank v. Fluor Corporation and Fluor Acquisition Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1987-01-05· cited 220×
• CPC International Inc. v. McKesson
  New York Court of Appeals· 1987-09-15· cited 217×
• Trans-Orient Marine Corporation v. Star Trading & Marine, Inc., and the Republic of the Sudan
  Second Circuit· 1991-02-06· cited 191×
• Mario Ronzani v. Sanofi S.A., Sanofi Incorporated, and Arnhold and S. Bleichroeder, Incorporated
  Second Circuit· 1990-03-27· cited 181×
• Unnamed case
  Second Circuit· 1989-12-18· cited 167×
• Armstrong v. Mcalpin
  Second Circuit· 1983-01-24· cited 145×
• State Trading Corporation of India, Ltd. v. Assuranceforeningen Skuld
  Second Circuit· 1990-12-07· cited 138×

Other cases named Shochat v. Weisz

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Shochat v. Weisz
  E.D. New York· 1992-06-23· cited 2×