State Trading Corporation of India, Ltd. v. Assuranceforeningen Skuld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the application of Connecticut's direct action statute would be inappropriate under the circumstances
• concluding that the application of Connecticut’s direct action statute would be inappropriate under the circumstances
• noting that failing to submit a proposed amended pleading “indicates lack of diligence and good faith”
• opining that where a moving party has an opportunity to assert an amendment earlier but waits until after judgment before requesting leave, “a court may exercise its discretion more exactingly”
• stating that “[w]hen the moving party has had an opportunity to assert the amendment earlier, but has waited until after judgment before requesting leave, a court may exercise its discretion more exactingly.”
• denying plaintiff leave to amend its complaint because plaintiff delayed raising certain claims to win a strategic advantage over the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).