Shikha v. Lyft, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, to preserve a claim of error for Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 25A-CR-97 | December 22, 2025 Page 14 of 45 appellate review, an objection must be sufficiently specific so as to fully alert the trial court to the legal issue to be resolved
• upholding jury verdict for plaintiff on assault claim where defendant “aggressively and rapidly advanced on the plaintiff with clenched fists, piercing eyes, beet-red face, popping veins, and screaming and searing at him” then backed plaintiff up against a wall
• “[A]n objection on grounds other than those raised on appeal is ineffective to preserve the issue for appellate review.”
• “[A]n objection on grounds other than those raised on appeal is ineffective to preserve an issue for appellate review.”
• “Only trial objections, not motions in limine, are effective to preserve claims of error for appellate review. Failure to object at trial to the admission of the evidence results in waiver of the error, notwithstanding a prior motion in limine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).